EPYC 7303 vs EPYC 8124P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 8124P
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
23.50
+28.2%
EPYC 7303
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 130 Watt
18.33

EPYC 8124P outperforms EPYC 7303 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 8124P and EPYC 7303 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking223338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.8921.11
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency17.4613.10
Architecture codenameSiena (2023−2024)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date18 September 2023 (1 year ago)5 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$639$604

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 8124P has 32% better value for money than EPYC 7303.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 8124P and EPYC 7303 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed2.45 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm
Die size2x 73 mm22x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)75 °Cno data
Number of transistors17,750 million8,300 million
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 8124P and EPYC 7303 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketSP6SP3
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 8124P and EPYC 7303. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 8124P and EPYC 7303 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 8124P and EPYC 7303. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 8124P and EPYC 7303.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes96128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 8124P 23.50
+28.2%
EPYC 7303 18.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 8124P 36630
+28.2%
EPYC 7303 28572

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.50 18.33
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 130 Watt

EPYC 8124P has a 28.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 8124P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7303 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 8124P and EPYC 7303, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 8124P
EPYC 8124P
AMD EPYC 7303
EPYC 7303

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7303 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 8124P or EPYC 7303, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.