Xeon E7450 vs EPYC 7H12

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
45.50
+601%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E7450 by a whopping 601% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking461063
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency14.826.58
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date18 September 2019 (5 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)no data
Threads128no data
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)12 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm45 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.45V

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4PGA604
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.50
+601%
Xeon E7450 6.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7H12 69633
+601%
Xeon E7450 9932

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 45.50 6.49
Recency 18 September 2019 1 July 2008
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 90 Watt

EPYC 7H12 has a 601.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E7450, on the other hand, has 211.1% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Xeon E7450
Xeon E7450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Xeon E7450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Xeon E7450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.