Xeon Gold 6137 vs EPYC 7F32

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
15.32
+21.1%

EPYC 7F32 outperforms Xeon Gold 6137 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6137 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking475626
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.64no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency7.765.63
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date14 April 2020 (4 years ago)1 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6137 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)25 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size74 mm2no data
Number of transistors3,800 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6137 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSP3FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6137. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6137 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6137 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6137. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size4 TiB768 GB
Max memory channels86
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6137.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7F32 15.32
+21.1%
Xeon Gold 6137 12.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7F32 23453
+21.1%
Xeon Gold 6137 19365

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.32 12.65
Recency 14 April 2020 1 July 2017
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 205 Watt

EPYC 7F32 has a 21.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 13.9% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7F32 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6137 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7F32 and Xeon Gold 6137, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32
Intel Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6137 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7F32 or Xeon Gold 6137, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.