Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
7.94
+80.5%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.40

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9501347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency50.096.41
Architecture codenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date7 May 2020 (4 years ago)30 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
Multiplier2136
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm12 nm
Die size156 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9,800 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP6Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 7.94
+80.5%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U 12616
+80.5%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6989

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.94 4.40
Integrated graphics card 6.04 4.51
Recency 7 May 2020 30 September 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U has a 80.5% higher aggregate performance score, 33.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 months, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 251 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 147 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U or Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.