i9-14900F vs EPYC 7763

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7763
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
53.23
+80.4%
Core i9-14900F
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
29.50

EPYC 7763 outperforms Core i9-14900F by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7763 and Core i9-14900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.3250.70
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency17.9942.95
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,890$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-14900F has 1427% better value for money than EPYC 7763.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7763 and Core i9-14900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads12832
Base clock speed2.45 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.6 GHz
Multiplier24.5no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+Intel 7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7763 and Core i9-14900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7763 and Core i9-14900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7763 and Core i9-14900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7763 and Core i9-14900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7763 and Core i9-14900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/s89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7763 and Core i9-14900F.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7763 53.23
+80.4%
i9-14900F 29.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7763 84557
+80.4%
i9-14900F 46860

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7763 1344
i9-14900F 2870
+114%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7763 10361
i9-14900F 18367
+77.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.23 29.50
Recency 15 March 2021 8 January 2024
Physical cores 64 24
Threads 128 32
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7763 has a 80.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

i9-14900F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 330.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-14900F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7763 and Core i9-14900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763
Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1197 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 91 vote

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7763 or Core i9-14900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.