i9-14900F vs EPYC 7643P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7643P
2023
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
43.23
+46.5%
Core i9-14900F
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
29.50

EPYC 7643P outperforms Core i9-14900F by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7643P and Core i9-14900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking50145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.7150.70
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency18.1842.95
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date5 September 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,722$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-14900F has 270% better value for money than EPYC 7643P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7643P and Core i9-14900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads9632
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7643P and Core i9-14900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketSP3FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7643P and Core i9-14900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7643P and Core i9-14900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7643P and Core i9-14900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7643P and Core i9-14900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7643P and Core i9-14900F.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes12816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7643P 43.23
+46.5%
i9-14900F 29.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7643P 68675
+46.6%
i9-14900F 46860

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.23 29.50
Recency 5 September 2023 8 January 2024
Physical cores 48 24
Threads 96 32
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 7643P has a 46.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

i9-14900F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 246.2% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7643P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-14900F in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7643P is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7643P and Core i9-14900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7643P
EPYC 7643P
Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7643P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 91 vote

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7643P or Core i9-14900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.