A6-6400B vs EPYC 7763
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7763 outperforms A6-6400B by a whopping 5138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 7763 and A6-6400B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 25 | 2444 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.15 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD EPYC | no data |
Power efficiency | 17.98 | 1.48 |
Architecture codename | Milan (2021−2023) | Richland (2013−2014) |
Release date | 12 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,890 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 7763 and A6-6400B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 128 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.45 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
Multiplier | 24.5 | no data |
L1 cache | 4 MB | 96K |
L2 cache | 32 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 7 nm+ | 32 nm |
Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
Number of transistors | 33,200 million | 1,303 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7763 and A6-6400B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Socket | SP3 | FM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7763 and A6-6400B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | + | + |
PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7763 and A6-6400B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7763 and A6-6400B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR3-1866 |
Maximum memory size | 4 TiB | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.795 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon HD 8470D |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7763 and A6-6400B.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 53.43 | 1.02 |
Recency | 12 January 2021 | 1 June 2013 |
Physical cores | 64 | 2 |
Threads | 128 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 65 Watt |
EPYC 7763 has a 5138.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
A6-6400B, on the other hand, has 330.8% lower power consumption.
The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-6400B in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation processor while A6-6400B is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7763 and A6-6400B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.