i3-550 vs A6-6400B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-6400B
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.02
+1%
Core i3-550
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.01

A6-6400B outperforms Core i3-550 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-6400B and Core i3-550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24602462
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.12
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.491.31
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)30 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$101

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-6400B and Core i3-550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
L1 cache96K64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,303 million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-6400B and Core i3-550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6400B and Core i3-550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+

Security technologies

A6-6400B and Core i3-550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6400B and Core i3-550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6400B and Core i3-550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16.38 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8470DIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video HDno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-6400B and Core i3-550 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6400B and Core i3-550.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-6400B 1.02
+1%
i3-550 1.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-6400B 1616
+0.4%
i3-550 1609

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.02 1.01
Integrated graphics card 0.97 0.77
Recency 1 June 2013 30 May 2010
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 73 Watt

A6-6400B has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, 26% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

i3-550, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-6400B and Core i3-550.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6400B and Core i3-550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-6400B
A6-6400B
Intel Core i3-550
Core i3-550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate A6-6400B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 429 votes

Rate Core i3-550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-6400B or Core i3-550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.