Apple M4 Max (16 cores) vs EPYC 7702P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7702P
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
39.85
+42.1%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.04

EPYC 7702P outperforms Apple M4 Max (16 cores) by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7702P and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking64165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.67no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M4
Power efficiency18.7629.33
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,425no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7702P and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads12816
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz4.51 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702P and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702P and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702P and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702P and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 40-core GPU

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.85 28.04
Recency 7 August 2019 30 October 2024
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 128 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 90 Watt

EPYC 7702P has a 42.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Apple M4 Max (16 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 122.2% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7702P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Max (16 cores) in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7702P is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702P and Apple M4 Max (16 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7702P
EPYC 7702P
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 33 votes

Rate EPYC 7702P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702P or Apple M4 Max (16 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.