Apple M4 Max (16 cores) vs EPYC 7502

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7502
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
30.21
+7.7%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.04

EPYC 7502 outperforms Apple M4 Max (16 cores) by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7502 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking139165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.73no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M4
Power efficiency15.8029.33
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,600no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7502 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6416
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz4.51 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm3 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7502 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7502 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7502 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7502 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 40-core GPU

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.21 28.04
Recency 7 August 2019 30 October 2024
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 90 Watt

EPYC 7502 has a 7.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Apple M4 Max (16 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7502 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores).

Be aware that EPYC 7502 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7502 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7502
EPYC 7502
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7502 or Apple M4 Max (16 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.