Xeon Platinum 8368 vs EPYC 7643

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7643 and Xeon Platinum 8368 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	31	15
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.44	1.30
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	AMD EPYC	no data
Architecture codename	Milan (2021)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)	6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$4,995	no data
Current price	$2838 (0.6x MSRP)	$12855

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7643 has 1011% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8368.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7643 and Xeon Platinum 8368 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	48 (Octatetraconta-Core)	38
Threads	96	76
Base clock speed	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.6 GHz	3.4 GHz
L1 cache	3 MB	64K (per core)
L2 cache	24 MB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	256 MB (shared)	57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	7 nm+	10 nm
Die size	8x 81 mm2	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	83 °C
Number of transistors	33,200 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7643 and Xeon Platinum 8368 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	2
Socket	SP3	4189
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7643 and Xeon Platinum 8368. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Security technologies

EPYC 7643 and Xeon Platinum 8368 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

no data

+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7643 and Xeon Platinum 8368 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7643 and Xeon Platinum 8368. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	4 TiB	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	204.795 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	no data	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7643 and Xeon Platinum 8368.

PCIe version	4.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	128	64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms EPYC 7643 by 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	49.17	59.52
Recency	12 January 2021	6 April 2021
Physical cores	48	38
Threads	96	76
Chip lithography	7 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	270 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7643 and Xeon Platinum 8368, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---