Ryzen 9 7950X vs EPYC 7663

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7663
2021
56 cores / 112 threads, 240 Watt
51.68
+31%
Ryzen 9 7950X
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.46

EPYC 7663 outperforms Ryzen 9 7950X by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7663 and Ryzen 9 7950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.89no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency20.3821.97
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Raphael (Zen 4) (2022)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,366no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7663 and Ryzen 9 7950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads11232
Base clock speed2 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.7 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache3584 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2CCD = 2x 70 sq. mm, I/O = 122 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors33,200 million13140 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7663 and Ryzen 9 7950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3AM5
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7663 and Ryzen 9 7950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm, 0.650 - 1.475 V
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7663 and Ryzen 9 7950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7663 and Ryzen 9 7950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7663 and Ryzen 9 7950X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7663 51.68
+31%
Ryzen 9 7950X 39.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7663 82087
+31%
Ryzen 9 7950X 62681

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.68 39.46
Recency 12 January 2021 27 September 2022
Physical cores 56 16
Threads 112 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 170 Watt

EPYC 7663 has a 31% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

Ryzen 9 7950X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 41.2% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7663 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 7950X in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7663 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7663 and Ryzen 9 7950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7663
EPYC 7663
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 13 votes

Rate EPYC 7663 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1647 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7663 or Ryzen 9 7950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.