Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs EPYC 7532

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
33.21
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
43.21
+30.1%

Xeon Platinum 8352Y outperforms EPYC 7532 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11951
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.7119.95
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)no data
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache2 MBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache256 MB48 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketSocket SP3FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7532 33.21
Xeon Platinum 8352Y 43.21
+30.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7532 52755
Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643
+30.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.21 43.21
Recency 19 February 2020 1 April 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 205 Watt

EPYC 7532 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 2.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y, on the other hand, has a 30.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Xeon Platinum 8352Y is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7532 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7532 or Xeon Platinum 8352Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.