Athlon Gold 7220U vs EPYC 7513

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
38.03
+1151%
Athlon Gold 7220U
2022
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.04

EPYC 7513 outperforms Athlon Gold 7220U by a whopping 1151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7513 and Athlon Gold 7220U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking851637
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.58no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency17.6618.82
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release date15 March 2021 (3 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,840no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7513 and Athlon Gold 7220U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads644
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.65 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+6 nm
Die size8x 81 mm2100 mm2
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7513 and Athlon Gold 7220U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP3FP6
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7513 and Athlon Gold 7220U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7513 and Athlon Gold 7220U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7513 and Athlon Gold 7220U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7513 and Athlon Gold 7220U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1284

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7513 38.03
+1151%
Athlon Gold 7220U 3.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7513 59285
+1151%
Athlon Gold 7220U 4740

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.03 3.04
Recency 15 March 2021 20 September 2022
Physical cores 32 2
Threads 64 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7513 has a 1151% higher aggregate performance score, and 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Athlon Gold 7220U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Gold 7220U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7513 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon Gold 7220U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7513 and Athlon Gold 7220U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U
Athlon Gold 7220U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 97 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 7220U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7513 or Athlon Gold 7220U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.