Celeron G6900TE vs EPYC 74F3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 74F3
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
38.19
+2463%
Celeron G6900TE
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.49

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Celeron G6900TE by a whopping 2463% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking772159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.20no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency15.064.03
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,900no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache1536 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm+10 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Number of transistors33,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP31700
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 74F3 38.19
+2463%
Celeron G6900TE 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 74F3 60666
+2457%
Celeron G6900TE 2373

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.19 1.49
Recency 12 January 2021 4 January 2022
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 240 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 74F3 has a 2463.1% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron G6900TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 585.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 74F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900TE in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 74F3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G6900TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 74F3 and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3
Intel Celeron G6900TE
Celeron G6900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 9 votes

Rate Celeron G6900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 74F3 or Celeron G6900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.