Ryzen 9 7940HX vs EPYC 7443

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7443
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
35.76
+5.2%
Ryzen 9 7940HX
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
33.98

EPYC 7443 outperforms Ryzen 9 7940HX by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7443 and Ryzen 9 7940HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking104113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.00no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
Power efficiency16.8558.22
Architecture codenameMilan (2021−2023)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,010no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7443 and Ryzen 9 7940HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2.85 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.2 GHz
Multiplier28.5no data
L1 cache1536 KB1 MB
L2 cache12 MB16 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography7 nm+5 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors16,600 million9900 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7443 and Ryzen 9 7940HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP3FL1
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7443 and Ryzen 9 7940HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7443 and Ryzen 9 7940HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7443 and Ryzen 9 7940HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.795 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7443 and Ryzen 9 7940HX.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7443 35.76
+5.2%
Ryzen 9 7940HX 33.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7443 56601
+5.2%
Ryzen 9 7940HX 53782

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.76 33.98
Recency 12 January 2021 17 January 2024
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 55 Watt

EPYC 7443 has a 5.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 9 7940HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 263.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 7443 and Ryzen 9 7940HX.

Be aware that EPYC 7443 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7940HX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7443 and Ryzen 9 7940HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7443
EPYC 7443
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
Ryzen 9 7940HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7443 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 44 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7940HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7443 or Ryzen 9 7940HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.