Xeon E7330 vs i3-10105F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.68
+38.5%

Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon E7330 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Xeon E7330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11321394
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency8.244.83
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)no data
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)1 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Xeon E7330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHzno data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Xeon E7330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200PGA604,PPGA604
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E7330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Xeon E7330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E7330 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E7330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Xeon E7330.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10105F 5.68
+38.5%
Xeon E7330 4.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8994
+38.6%
Xeon E7330 6491

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.68 4.10
Recency 16 March 2021 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 80 Watt

i3-10105F has a 38.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-10105F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7330 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while Xeon E7330 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Xeon E7330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
Intel Xeon E7330
Xeon E7330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3583 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E7330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or Xeon E7330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.