Ryzen 5 5625U vs EPYC 7352

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7352
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
25.41
+171%
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
9.39

EPYC 7352 outperforms Ryzen 5 5625U by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 5 5625U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking194809
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.85no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency15.5159.24
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 5 5625U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads4812
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 5 5625U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FP6
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 5 5625U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 5 5625U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 5 5625U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 5 5625U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7352 25.41
+171%
Ryzen 5 5625U 9.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7352 40370
+171%
Ryzen 5 5625U 14910

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.41 9.39
Recency 7 August 2019 6 January 2022
Physical cores 24 6
Threads 48 12
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC 7352 has a 170.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ryzen 5 5625U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 933.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7352 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 5625U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7352 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 5625U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and Ryzen 5 5625U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U
Ryzen 5 5625U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1178 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5625U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352 or Ryzen 5 5625U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.