EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7352

Place in the ranking	193	47
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.84	no data
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	AMD EPYC	AMD EPYC
Power efficiency	15.51	14.82
Architecture codename	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date	7 August 2019 (5 years ago)	18 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,350	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	24 (Tetracosa-Core)	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads	48	128
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
Multiplier	23	26
L1 cache	96K (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	128 MB (shared)	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Die size	192 mm²	192 mm²
Number of transistors	4,800 million	4,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	+	+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	TR4	TR4
Power consumption (TDP)	155 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Precision Boost 2	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Eight-channel	DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size	4 TiB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	no data	8
Maximum memory bandwidth	204.763 GB/s	204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7352 25.41

EPYC 7H12 43.84
+72.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7352 40370

EPYC 7H12 69633
+72.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.41	43.84
Recency	7 August 2019	18 September 2019
Physical cores	24	64
Threads	48	128
Power consumption (TDP)	155 Watt	280 Watt

EPYC 7352 has 80.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has a 72.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7352 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.