EPYC 7702P vs EPYC 7352

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7352
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
25.41
EPYC 7702P
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
39.85
+56.8%

EPYC 7702P outperforms EPYC 7352 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7702P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.846.33
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.5118.86
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350$4,425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7352 has 71% better value for money than EPYC 7702P.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7702P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads48128
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.35 GHz
Multiplier2320
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7702P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketTR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7702P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7702P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7702P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7352 25.41
EPYC 7702P 39.85
+56.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7352 40370
EPYC 7702P 63300
+56.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.41 39.85
Physical cores 24 64
Threads 48 128
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 200 Watt

EPYC 7352 has 29% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7702P, on the other hand, has a 56.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The EPYC 7702P is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7352 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7352 and EPYC 7702P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352
AMD EPYC 7702P
EPYC 7702P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 32 votes

Rate EPYC 7702P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352 or EPYC 7702P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.