Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs EPYC 7351P

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
16.15
+1531%
Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.99

EPYC 7351P outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by a whopping 1531% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351P and Core 2 Quad Q9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4152477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.63no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCIntel Core 2 Quad
Power efficiency8.992.08
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750$348

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and Core 2 Quad Q9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache1.5 MBno data
L2 cache8 MB6 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size213 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and Core 2 Quad Q9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and Core 2 Quad Q9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

EPYC 7351P and Core 2 Quad Q9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and Core 2 Quad Q9000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and Core 2 Quad Q9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and Core 2 Quad Q9000.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7351P 16.15
+1531%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 0.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7351P 25657
+1529%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 1575

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7351P 630
+130%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 274

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7351P 4738
+600%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 677

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.15 0.99
Recency 20 June 2017 1 January 2009
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 45 Watt

EPYC 7351P has a 1531.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Quad Q9000, on the other hand, has 244.4% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7351P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q9000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and Core 2 Quad Q9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7351P or Core 2 Quad Q9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.