FX-4320 vs EPYC 7351P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7351P
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
16.15
+716%
FX-4320
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.98

EPYC 7351P outperforms FX-4320 by a whopping 716% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351P and FX-4320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4151939
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.63no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency8.991.97
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and FX-4320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speed2.4 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache1.5 MB192 KB
L2 cache8 MB4096 KB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)4096 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size213 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors19200 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and FX-4320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and FX-4320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and FX-4320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and FX-4320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and FX-4320.

PCIe version3.0Not Listed
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7351P 16.15
+716%
FX-4320 1.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7351P 25657
+715%
FX-4320 3150

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.15 1.98
Recency 20 June 2017 23 October 2012
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 95 Watt

EPYC 7351P has a 715.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

FX-4320, on the other hand, has 63.2% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7351P is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4320 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while FX-4320 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and FX-4320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P
AMD FX-4320
FX-4320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 138 votes

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7351P or FX-4320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.