EPYC 7773X vs EPYC 7302

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7302
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
21.63
EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
59.78
+176%

EPYC 7773X outperforms EPYC 7302 by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25821
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.78no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency12.7219.47
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Milan-X (2022)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$978no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads32128
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache1 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7302 21.63
EPYC 7773X 59.78
+176%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7302 33106
EPYC 7773X 91491
+176%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 7302 1209
EPYC 7773X 1531
+26.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 7302 8691
EPYC 7773X 15277
+75.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.63 59.78
Recency 7 August 2019 22 March 2022
Physical cores 16 64
Threads 32 128
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 280 Watt

EPYC 7302 has 80.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has a 176.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7302 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7302 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7302 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.