i3-4330TE vs A8-3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3800
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.29
+1.6%
Core i3-4330TE
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.27

A8-3800 outperforms Core i3-4330TE by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-3800 and Core i3-4330TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22862295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.883.43
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)11 May 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3800 and Core i3-4330TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size228 mm2177 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-3800 and Core i3-4330TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM11150
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3800 and Core i3-4330TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3800 and Core i3-4330TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3800 and Core i3-4330TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6550DIntel HD 4600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3800 and Core i3-4330TE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3800 1.29
+1.6%
i3-4330TE 1.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-3800 2049
+1.3%
i3-4330TE 2022

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 1.27
Recency 30 June 2011 11 May 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

A8-3800 has a 1.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

i3-4330TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-3800 and Core i3-4330TE.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3800 and Core i3-4330TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3800
A8-3800
Intel Core i3-4330TE
Core i3-4330TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 71 vote

Rate A8-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-4330TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3800 or Core i3-4330TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.