A10-4657M vs E2-9010

VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9010
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.69
A10-4657M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.11
+60.9%

A10-4657M outperforms E2-9010 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9010 and A10-4657M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27282411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD A-Series
Power efficiency4.353.00
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-9010 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million1303 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-9010 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9010 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9010 and A10-4657M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9010 and A10-4657M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)
iGPU core count2no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9010 and A10-4657M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9010 and A10-4657M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9010 and A10-4657M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-9010 0.69
A10-4657M 1.11
+60.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-9010 1093
A10-4657M 1759
+60.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 1.11
Recency 1 June 2016 1 April 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

E2-9010 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

A10-4657M, on the other hand, has a 60.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The A10-4657M is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9010 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-9010 and A10-4657M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9010
E2-9010
AMD A10-4657M
A10-4657M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 32 votes

Rate E2-9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A10-4657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-9010 or A10-4657M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.