A10-4657M vs A6-9225

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
A10-4657M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.11
+32.1%

A10-4657M outperforms A6-9225 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and A10-4657M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25702397
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD A-Series
Power efficiency5.303.00
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size124.5 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million1303 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGABGA
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and A10-4657M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon HD 7660G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9225 0.84
A10-4657M 1.11
+32.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9225 1332
A10-4657M 1759
+32.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 1.11
Integrated graphics card 1.17 1.23
Recency 1 June 2018 1 April 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

A6-9225 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

A10-4657M, on the other hand, has a 32.1% higher aggregate performance score, 5.1% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The A10-4657M is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9225 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and A10-4657M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
AMD A10-4657M
A10-4657M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2292 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A10-4657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or A10-4657M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.