A6-7000 vs E2-9000

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-9000
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.59
A6-7000
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.63
+6.8%

A6-7000 outperforms E2-9000 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-9000 and A6-7000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28692839
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency5.623.53
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-9000 and A6-7000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3 GHz
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-9000 and A6-7000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGAFT3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-9000 and A6-7000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-9000 and A6-7000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-9000 and A6-7000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare R2 (Stoney Ridge) and R4 Graphics
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-9000 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-9000 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-9000 and A6-7000.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E2-9000 0.59
A6-7000 0.63
+6.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-9000 950
A6-7000 1010
+6.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 0.63
Recency 1 June 2016 1 June 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 17 Watt

E2-9000 has an age advantage of 2 years, and 70% lower power consumption.

A6-7000, on the other hand, has a 6.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E2-9000 and A6-7000.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-9000
E2-9000
AMD A6-7000
A6-7000

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 325 votes

Rate E2-9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 14 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E2-9000 and A6-7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.