A6-7000 vs A9-9420

VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9420
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.94
+46.9%
A6-7000
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.64

A9-9420 outperforms A6-7000 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9420 and A6-7000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25072762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency5.933.56
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9420 and A6-7000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A9-9420 and A6-7000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT4FT3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9420 and A6-7000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9420 and A6-7000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9420 and A6-7000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9420 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9420 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9420 and A6-7000.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9420 0.94
+46.9%
A6-7000 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9420 1498
+48.3%
A6-7000 1010

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 0.64
Recency 31 May 2016 1 June 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 17 Watt

A9-9420 has a 46.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

The A9-9420 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9420 and A6-7000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9420
A9-9420
AMD A6-7000
A6-7000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 511 votes

Rate A9-9420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 14 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9420 or A6-7000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.