Pentium 4 1.6 vs E2-6110
Primary details
Comparing E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2694 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.46 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Beema (2014) | Willamette (2000−2001) |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | August 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 8 KB |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 217 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 42 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FT3b | 423 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 61 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 61 Watt |
E2-6110 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 306.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E2-6110 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 1.6 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E2-6110 and Pentium 4 1.6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
