Ryzen 5 5600H vs A4 Micro-6400T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4 Micro-6400T
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
0.68
Ryzen 5 5600H
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
10.68
+1471%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms A4 Micro-6400T by a whopping 1471% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4 Micro-6400T and Ryzen 5 5600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2723729
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency14.3022.46
Architecture codenameMullins (2014)Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4 Micro-6400T and Ryzen 5 5600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data33
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache2048 KB3 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A4 Micro-6400T and Ryzen 5 5600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bFP6
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Ryzen 5 5600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Ryzen 5 5600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Ryzen 5 5600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR4
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz)
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4 Micro-6400T and Ryzen 5 5600H integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Ryzen 5 5600H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Ryzen 5 5600H.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4 Micro-6400T 0.68
Ryzen 5 5600H 10.68
+1471%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4 Micro-6400T 1082
Ryzen 5 5600H 16961
+1468%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4 Micro-6400T 1251
Ryzen 5 5600H 5817
+365%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A4 Micro-6400T 3380
Ryzen 5 5600H 34229
+913%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A4 Micro-6400T 1664
Ryzen 5 5600H 11952
+618%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A4 Micro-6400T 46.27
Ryzen 5 5600H 6.58
+603%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A4 Micro-6400T 1
Ryzen 5 5600H 19
+1510%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A4 Micro-6400T 95
Ryzen 5 5600H 1563
+1545%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

A4 Micro-6400T 34
Ryzen 5 5600H 223
+556%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

A4 Micro-6400T 0.41
Ryzen 5 5600H 2.62
+539%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

A4 Micro-6400T 0.7
Ryzen 5 5600H 7.4
+921%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

A4 Micro-6400T 7
Ryzen 5 5600H 95
+1279%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

A4 Micro-6400T 34
Ryzen 5 5600H 251
+650%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

A4 Micro-6400T 820
Ryzen 5 5600H 7497
+814%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 10.68
Recency 29 April 2014 12 January 2021
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 45 Watt

A4 Micro-6400T has 1025% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 5600H, on the other hand, has a 1470.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 5600H is our recommended choice as it beats the A4 Micro-6400T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4 Micro-6400T and Ryzen 5 5600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4 Micro-6400T
A4 Micro-6400T
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Ryzen 5 5600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate A4 Micro-6400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4588 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4 Micro-6400T or Ryzen 5 5600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.