EPYC 7272 vs E-350

VS

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and EPYC 7272 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.79
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data12.49
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E-350 and EPYC 7272 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache64K (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size75 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and EPYC 7272 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFT1SP3
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and EPYC 7272. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and EPYC 7272 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and EPYC 7272. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and EPYC 7272.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 421
EPYC 7272 25161
+5876%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 7 August 2019
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 120 Watt

E-350 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7272, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E-350 and EPYC 7272. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7272 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and EPYC 7272, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
AMD EPYC 7272
EPYC 7272

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or EPYC 7272, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.