EPYC 7742 vs E-350

VS

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and EPYC 7742 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated45
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data18.45
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,950

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E-350 and EPYC 7742 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplierno data22.5
L1 cache64K (per core)4 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)32 MB
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size75 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and EPYC 7742 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFT1TR4
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and EPYC 7742. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and EPYC 7742 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and EPYC 7742. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 421
EPYC 7742 69663
+16447%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-350 105
EPYC 7742 1204
+1047%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-350 179
EPYC 7742 11782
+6482%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 7 August 2019
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 225 Watt

E-350 has 1150% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7742, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E-350 and EPYC 7742. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7742 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and EPYC 7742, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
AMD EPYC 7742
EPYC 7742

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 128 votes

Rate EPYC 7742 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or EPYC 7742, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.