i5-10400F vs E-350

VS

Aggregate performance score

E-350
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.27
Core i5-10400F
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
8.20
+2937%

Core i5-10400F outperforms E-350 by a whopping 2937% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and Core i5-10400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3147926
Place by popularitynot in top-1009
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.4211.94
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$155

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E-350 and Core i5-10400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm14 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and Core i5-10400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Core i5-10400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

E-350 and Core i5-10400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Core i5-10400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Core i5-10400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Core i5-10400F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-350 0.27
i5-10400F 8.20
+2937%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 422
i5-10400F 13029
+2987%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E-350 106
i5-10400F 1455
+1273%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E-350 182
i5-10400F 5776
+3074%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E-350 1049
i5-10400F 6719
+541%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

E-350 2005
i5-10400F 36564
+1724%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E-350 68.8
i5-10400F 6.25
+1001%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E-350 1
i5-10400F 14
+2259%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 8.20
Recency 4 January 2011 30 April 2020
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

E-350 has 261.1% lower power consumption.

i5-10400F, on the other hand, has a 2937% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-10400F is our recommended choice as it beats the E-350 in performance tests.

Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while Core i5-10400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Core i5-10400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
Intel Core i5-10400F
Core i5-10400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 396 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 13785 votes

Rate Core i5-10400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-350 or Core i5-10400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.