i5-10400 vs E-350
Primary details
Comparing E-350 and Core i5-10400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 953 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 97 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 11.11 |
Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Comet Lake (2020) |
Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E-350 and Core i5-10400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on E-350 and Core i5-10400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FT1 | FCLGA1200 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Core i5-10400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
E-350 and Core i5-10400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Core i5-10400 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Core i5-10400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 41.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.1 GHz |
InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of E-350 and Core i5-10400 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by E-350 and Core i5-10400 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2160@30Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by E-350 and Core i5-10400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-350 and Core i5-10400.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 January 2011 | 30 April 2020 |
Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
E-350 has 261.1% lower power consumption.
i5-10400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between E-350 and Core i5-10400. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E-350 is a notebook processor while Core i5-10400 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-350 and Core i5-10400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.