Athlon XP 3200+ vs E-300

VS

Aggregate performance score

E-300
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.21
+16.7%
Athlon XP 3200+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 77 Watt
0.18

E-300 outperforms Athlon XP 3200+ by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-300 and Athlon XP 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32073269
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency1.100.22
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Barton (2001−2004)
Release date22 August 2011 (13 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-300 and Athlon XP 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm130 nm
Die size75 mm2101 mm2
Number of transistorsno data63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E-300 and Athlon XP 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1A
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt77 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-300 and Athlon XP 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVMno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-300 and Athlon XP 3200+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-300 and Athlon XP 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-300 0.21
+16.7%
Athlon XP 3200+ 0.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-300 340
+21%
Athlon XP 3200+ 281

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.18
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 77 Watt

E-300 has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 327.8% lower power consumption.

The E-300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon XP 3200+ in performance tests.

Be aware that E-300 is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 3200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-300 and Athlon XP 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-300
E-300
AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Athlon XP 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 303 votes

Rate E-300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 24 votes

Rate Athlon XP 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-300 or Athlon XP 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.