Ryzen AI 9 365 vs E-240

VS

Primary details

Comparing E-240 and Ryzen AI 9 365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data62.33
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Strix Point (2024)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)July 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

E-240 and Ryzen AI 9 365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm4 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on E-240 and Ryzen AI 9 365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFP8
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-240 and Ryzen AI 9 365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-240 and Ryzen AI 9 365 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-240 and Ryzen AI 9 365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6310AMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-240 and Ryzen AI 9 365.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-240 195
Ryzen AI 9 365 29288
+14919%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

E-240 938
Ryzen AI 9 365 8446
+801%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

E-240 501
Ryzen AI 9 365 14361
+2769%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

E-240 137.4
Ryzen AI 9 365 6.7
+1951%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

E-240 0
Ryzen AI 9 365 31
+11754%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 20
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 28 Watt

E-240 has 55.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 9 365, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E-240 and Ryzen AI 9 365. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-240 and Ryzen AI 9 365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-240
E-240
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
Ryzen AI 9 365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 55 votes

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 35 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-240 or Ryzen AI 9 365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.