GX-210JA vs E-240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing E-240 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Temash (2013)
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-240 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nm28 nm
Die size75 mm2no data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E-240 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-240 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-240 and GX-210JA are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-240 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-240 195
GX-210JA 248
+27.2%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2011 23 May 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 6 Watt

GX-210JA has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between E-240 and GX-210JA. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-240 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-240
E-240
AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 55 votes

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-240 or GX-210JA, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.