A4-5145M vs E-240
Primary details
Comparing E-240 and A4-5145M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3354 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD E-Series | AMD A-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.63 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E-240 and A4-5145M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E-240 and A4-5145M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FP2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-240 and A4-5145M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-240 and A4-5145M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-240 and A4-5145M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6310 | AMD Radeon HD 8310G (424 - 554 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 1 June 2013 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 17 Watt |
A4-5145M has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between E-240 and A4-5145M. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-240 and A4-5145M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
