Xeon w5-2545 vs i9-13900F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
32.27
+23%
Xeon w5-2545
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 210 Watt
26.24

Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon w5-2545 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900F and Xeon w5-2545 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking125183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.7183.24
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency46.9811.83
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524$889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w5-2545 has 52% better value for money than i9-13900F.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900F and Xeon w5-2545 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)30 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C74 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900F and Xeon w5-2545 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w5-2545. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i9-13900F and Xeon w5-2545 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w5-2545 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w5-2545. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GB2 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w5-2545.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900F 32.27
+23%
Xeon w5-2545 26.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900F 51259
+23%
Xeon w5-2545 41688

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.27 26.24
Recency 4 January 2023 24 August 2024
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 32 24
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 210 Watt

i9-13900F has a 23% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 223.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-2545, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon w5-2545 in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900F is a desktop processor while Xeon w5-2545 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900F and Xeon w5-2545, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F
Intel Xeon w5-2545
Xeon w5-2545

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 157 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon w5-2545 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900F or Xeon w5-2545, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.