Xeon w9-3495X vs i9-13900F

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
33.43
Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
60.07
+79.7%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Core i9-13900F by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12420
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.0518.56
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency46.9015.65
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900F has 197% better value for money than Xeon w9-3495X.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads32112
Base clock speed2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)105 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size192 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900F 33.43
Xeon w9-3495X 60.07
+79.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900F 51163
Xeon w9-3495X 91936
+79.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-13900F 2794
+32.4%
Xeon w9-3495X 2111

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-13900F 17511
Xeon w9-3495X 18577
+6.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.43 60.07
Recency 4 January 2023 15 February 2023
Physical cores 24 56
Threads 32 112
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 350 Watt

i9-13900F has 438.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3495X, on the other hand, has a 79.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 133.3% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-13900F in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900F is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900F and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 130 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900F or Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.