Xeon Gold 6448Y vs i9-13900F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
33.48
Xeon Gold 6448Y
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
39.58
+18.2%

Xeon Gold 6448Y outperforms Core i9-13900F by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 6448Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation57.3026.53
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency46.8716.01
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$524$3,583

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900F has 116% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6448Y.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 6448Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)60 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 6448Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 6448Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 6448Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 6448Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 6448Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size192 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 6448Y.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05
PCI Express lanes2080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900F 33.48
Xeon Gold 6448Y 39.58
+18.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900F 51126
Xeon Gold 6448Y 60449
+18.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.48 39.58
Physical cores 24 32
Threads 32 64
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

i9-13900F has 246.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6448Y, on the other hand, has a 18.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6448Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-13900F in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-13900F is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6448Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900F and Xeon Gold 6448Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F
Intel Xeon Gold 6448Y
Xeon Gold 6448Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 117 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6448Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900F or Xeon Gold 6448Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.