i9-10900E vs i9-13900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13900
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
29.57
+141%
Core i9-10900E
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
12.26

Core i9-13900 outperforms Core i9-10900E by a whopping 141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking144624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.0612.22
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency22.3917.85
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$488

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900 has 277% better value for money than i9-10900E.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads3220
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm14 nm
Die size257 mm2206 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA17001200
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 770Intel UHD Graphics 630
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13900 29.57
+141%
i9-10900E 12.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13900 46967
+141%
i9-10900E 19469

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-13900 2764
+75.8%
i9-10900E 1572

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-13900 16611
+95.8%
i9-10900E 8485

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.57 12.26
Integrated graphics card 6.15 3.09
Recency 4 January 2023 30 April 2020
Physical cores 24 10
Threads 32 20
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13900 has a 141.2% higher aggregate performance score, 99% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and 140% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

i9-10900E, on the other hand, has 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10900E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13900 and Core i9-10900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13900
Core i9-13900
Intel Core i9-10900E
Core i9-10900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 119 votes

Rate Core i9-13900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Core i9-10900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13900 or Core i9-10900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.