i3-12100TE vs i7-8670
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-8670 and Core i3-12100TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 964 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 20.19 |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 (6 years ago) | January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-8670 and Core i3-12100TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 149 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-8670 and Core i3-12100TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | 1151 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8670 and Core i3-12100TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| SIPP | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-8670 and Core i3-12100TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8670 and Core i3-12100TE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8670 and Core i3-12100TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8670 and Core i3-12100TE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 3.09 | 4.15 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
i7-8670 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.
i3-12100TE, on the other hand, has 34.3% faster integrated GPU, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-8670 and Core i3-12100TE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8670 and Core i3-12100TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
