Ryzen Threadripper 2900X vs i7-8670
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-8670 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 (6 years ago) | August 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-8670 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 32768 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 149 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-8670 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | 1151 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8670 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| SIPP | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-8670 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8670 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8670 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8670 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
i7-8670 has 92.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 2900X, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-8670 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8670 and Ryzen Threadripper 2900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
