3015e vs i7-8670
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-8670 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2033 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i7 | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
Power efficiency | no data | 26.90 |
Architecture codename | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Pollock (Zen) (2020) |
Release date | 1 January 2018 (6 years ago) | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i7-8670 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 12 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 149 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-8670 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | 1151 | FT5 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8670 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
SIPP | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-8670 and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8670 and 3015e are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8670 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8670 and 3015e.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 3.09 | 2.98 |
Recency | 1 January 2018 | 4 August 2020 |
Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
Threads | 12 | 4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
i7-8670 has 3.7% faster integrated GPU, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
3015e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 983.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i7-8670 and 3015e. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i7-8670 is a desktop processor while 3015e is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8670 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.