Ryzen 7 2700 vs i7-620UM

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-620UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.70
Ryzen 7 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.07
+1339%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i7-620UM by a whopping 1339% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-620UM and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2713776
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.51
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency3.6114.39
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$278$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-620UM and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.06 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier832
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size81+114 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-620UM and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288AM4
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620UM and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-620UM and Ryzen 7 2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620UM and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620UM and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency500 MHz-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620UM and Ryzen 7 2700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620UM and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-620UM 0.70
Ryzen 7 2700 10.07
+1339%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-620UM 1091
Ryzen 7 2700 15702
+1339%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-620UM 2111
Ryzen 7 2700 4505
+113%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-620UM 4004
Ryzen 7 2700 31385
+684%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 10.07
Recency 7 January 2010 19 April 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

i7-620UM has 261.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 2700, on the other hand, has a 1338.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 2700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-620UM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-620UM is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620UM and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-620UM
Core i7-620UM
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 12 votes

Rate Core i7-620UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3081 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-620UM or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.