Ryzen 7 2700X vs Atom 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 330
2008
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.23
Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.02
+4691%

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Atom 330 by a whopping 4691% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 2700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3189709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency2.729.93
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4.35 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1237
L1 cache112 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437AM4
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 2700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 2700X.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom 330 0.23
Ryzen 7 2700X 11.02
+4691%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
Ryzen 7 2700X 17509
+4723%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom 330 542
Ryzen 7 2700X 5256
+870%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom 330 1530
Ryzen 7 2700X 34763
+2172%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom 330 825
Ryzen 7 2700X 10643
+1191%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom 330 116.45
Ryzen 7 2700X 3.48
+3246%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 11.02
Recency 2 April 2008 19 April 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 105 Watt

Atom 330 has 1212.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 2700X, on the other hand, has a 4691.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 2700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Ryzen 7 2700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 65 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2968 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Ryzen 7 2700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.