EPYC 9474F vs i7-2670QM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2670QM
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.36
EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
66.11
+2701%

EPYC 9474F outperforms Core i7-2670QM by a whopping 2701% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2670QM and EPYC 9474F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking178411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.29
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.9617.38
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378$6,780

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2670QM and EPYC 9474F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads896
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier2236
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size216 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2670QM and EPYC 9474F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCPGA988SP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2670QM and EPYC 9474F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i7-2670QM and EPYC 9474F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2670QM and EPYC 9474F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2670QM and EPYC 9474F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2670QM and EPYC 9474F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2670QM and EPYC 9474F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2670QM 2.36
EPYC 9474F 66.11
+2701%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2670QM 3745
EPYC 9474F 105010
+2704%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.36 66.11
Recency 12 October 2011 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 48
Threads 8 96
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 360 Watt

i7-2670QM has 700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9474F, on the other hand, has a 2701.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9474F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2670QM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2670QM is a notebook processor while EPYC 9474F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2670QM and EPYC 9474F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2670QM
Core i7-2670QM
AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 771 vote

Rate Core i7-2670QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2670QM or EPYC 9474F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.