EPYC 9634 vs EPYC 9474F

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9474F
2022
48 cores / 96 threads, 360 Watt
66.11
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
67.96
+2.8%

EPYC 9634 outperforms EPYC 9474F by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.582.11
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Power efficiency17.3822.18
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,780$10,304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9474F has 164% better value for money than EPYC 9634.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores48 (Octatetraconta-Core)84
Threads96168
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier3622.5
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size8x 72 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors52,560 million78,840 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9634.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9474F 66.11
EPYC 9634 67.96
+2.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9474F 105010
EPYC 9634 107944
+2.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 66.11 67.96
Physical cores 48 84
Threads 96 168
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 290 Watt

EPYC 9634 has a 2.8% higher aggregate performance score, 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads, and 24.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9634.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9474F and EPYC 9634, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9474F
EPYC 9474F
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate EPYC 9474F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9474F or EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.