Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs i7-13790F
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-13790F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U by a whopping 154% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-13790F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 150 | 676 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 56.10 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 42.44 | 72.49 |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 10 February 2023 (1 year ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $441 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-13790F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 33 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-13790F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1700 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-13790F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i7-13790F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-13790F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-13790F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 740M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-13790F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 29.15 | 11.49 |
| Recency | 10 February 2023 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
| Threads | 24 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
i7-13790F has a 153.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 166.7% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-13790F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U in performance tests.
Note that Core i7-13790F is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-13790F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
